Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Zachary Eisinga Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Eisinga analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Zachary Eisinga Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Eisinga
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.07% of points on their second serve, while Eisinga has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eisinga has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 51.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eisinga has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Eisinga winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Eisinga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 41/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.35% of matches (W/L 43/ 19), where as Eisinga has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times and Eisinga being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Eisinga winning 1. The last match between Nijboer and Eisinga was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 22-11-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Eisinga have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nijboer winning 1 times and Eisinga 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Eisinga 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.27 while Eisinga has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eisinga has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 45.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eisinga has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
433
Rank
428
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
868
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (222-170)
Career Total W/L
55% (48-40)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Zachary Eisinga |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:41:0 | 2:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (54/104) | 58% (52/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (40/54) | 73% (38/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (23/50) | 47% (18/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (34/90) | 39% (41/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Zachary Eisinga
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Zachary Eisinga |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (47/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (409/369) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 143 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 230.92 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1433/2429) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (982/1433) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (493/996) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (125/281) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1045/2497) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (20/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
George Goldhoff
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Laurent Lokoli
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zachary Eisinga Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(4) 13-11 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dax Donders
Player
Zachary Eisinga
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
77 of
96)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Cacao
Player
Zachary Eisinga
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Eisinga
Player
Jakob Schnaitter
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mason Recci
Player
Zachary Eisinga
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zachary Eisinga
Player
Abdulhamid Mubarak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Nijboer Vs Eisinga Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
